Toyota FT-86 Concept

Non Technical Talk in here
User avatar
kobi
moderator
moderator
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by kobi »

scientist wrote:
skidmarx wrote:
scientist wrote:Hyundai and Mitsubishi sharing engines. the new 86 would definitely not stack up against the Genesis Coupe
with its current engine choice?
The 3S, SR20, 4G63, RB25/26, 1/2JZ etc are all old engine designs. the amount of modifications + the amount of power loss and efficiency loss would not make none of those engines a worthwhile venture for the manufacturers. That's why they have all been replaced.
Educate them Sci...
some slow honda guys just like to prance on ppl's opinion and don't have one of their own. last time i check...even onlydom is democratic
The last time i heard..the new impreza was the ugliest thing. them don't say that anymore. do they?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Even Jeremy Clarkson have some bull**** opinion too but its his.

User avatar
damien
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by damien »

and all you do is piss and moan when someone talks bad about cars you like. Go on exercising democracy
Image

motion sickness
Power Junkie
Power Junkie
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:19 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by motion sickness »

The new Impreza is still ugly after all this time.......Lets take one more swing at that dead horse. Time doesn't change ugliness.

If you call a boxer motor, which both Porshe, Subaru and SAAB have had for many many many years new, well I really don't know what to think. The horizontally opposed motor has been re-worked many a times so why not any of the aforementioned engine options.

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by scientist »

motion sickness wrote:The new Impreza is still ugly after all this time.......Lets take one more swing at that dead horse. Time doesn't change ugliness.

If you call a boxer motor, which both Porshe, Subaru and SAAB have had for many many many years new, well I really don't know what to think. The horizontally opposed motor has been re-worked many a times so why not any of the aforementioned engine options.
Saab no longer uses the flat four. As I said, the amount of effort and money it takes into developing those older engines to meet current requirements is not worthwhile for those manufacturers.

the JZ and RBs are too big, Toyota and Nissan went the compact V6 route. These engines require less of a lengthy hood as their inline counterpart. Allowing them to create larger crumple zones.

the 4G6x (Sirius) Motors have been around since the 1970s. The cast IRON block is HEAVY, they went to an aluminum Design to save Weight.

3S motors take up a lot of engine bay space in FWD cars, The RWD cars that used to be equipped with S series now carry a compact V6, which makes more power and provides more low end grunt.

Even BMW replaced their inlines in their High performance cars. the M5 now comes with a V8. Times move on, you can either move with it or stay reminiscing. The 4B11 has already started proving its a worthwhile replacement to the 4G63. Nissans VQ series of motors have already proven themselves. the QR is also another Decent engine.
Toyota pretty much dropped out of the Performance game and the lexus's aren't exactly outright performance cars.
/////////Ralliart

motion sickness
Power Junkie
Power Junkie
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:19 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by motion sickness »

scientist wrote:
motion sickness wrote:The new Impreza is still ugly after all this time.......Lets take one more swing at that dead horse. Time doesn't change ugliness.

If you call a boxer motor, which both Porshe, Subaru and SAAB have had for many many many years new, well I really don't know what to think. The horizontally opposed motor has been re-worked many a times so why not any of the aforementioned engine options.
Saab no longer uses the flat four. As I said, the amount of effort and money it takes into developing those older engines to meet current requirements is not worthwhile for those manufacturers.

the JZ and RBs are too big, Toyota and Nissan went the compact V6 route. These engines require less of a lengthy hood as their inline counterpart. Allowing them to create larger crumple zones.


the 4G6x (Sirius) Motors have been around since the 1970s. The cast IRON block is HEAVY, they went to an aluminum Design to save Weight.

3S motors take up a lot of engine bay space in FWD cars, The RWD cars that used to be equipped with S series now carry a compact V6, which makes more power and provides more low end grunt.

Even BMW replaced their inlines in their High performance cars. the M5 now comes with a V8. Times move on, you can either move with it or stay reminiscing. The 4B11 has already started proving its a worthwhile replacement to the 4G63. Nissans VQ series of motors have already proven themselves. the QR is also another Decent engine.
Toyota pretty much dropped out of the Performance game and the lexus's aren't exactly outright performance cars.
And I agree with what your saying. Thats why I mention Toyota should get back with Yahama, instead of Subaru to use an equally outdated engine, which does not represent the true spirit of the AE86. I believe Toyota should not associate this car with the Hachi Roku. Its a kick in the balls to the purists. Toyota has really lost touch.

User avatar
damien
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by damien »

Digging the Yamaha idea myself.

The head of Toyota himself has said that the company has lost its way in what its customers really WANT to buy from them. And now with their reliability cred starting to fall, they need a new direction. Ford is making headway in revitalising it's client base, Toyota (AND Honda) have work to do as well.
Image

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by skidmarx »

And I agree with what your saying. Thats why I mention Toyota should get back with Yahama, instead of Subaru to use an equally outdated engine, which does not represent the true spirit of the AE86. I believe Toyota should not associate this car with the Hachi Roku. Its a kick in the balls to the purists. Toyota has really lost touch.
Thats what the argument was about in the first place. not really which engine is best, but the image of the hachi roku being mangled with the use of a boxer. no doubt toyo has atleast one engine that can get the new 86 there.

keep this discussion focused on the image and not which engine is better. and stop bashing lol. this is getting funny.

Oh and about opinion.... everybody has one but it aint gospel!
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
kobi
moderator
moderator
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by kobi »

damien wrote:and all you do is piss and moan when someone talks bad about cars you like. Go on exercising democracy
Well damian if ppl like you would stop hating...ppl like me would have no need to defend.
one of my favorite cars is Honda of which you have one.

"Go Boost or Go Home"

TheGoodGuy
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:24 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by TheGoodGuy »

"Go Boost or Go Home"
... lol.. ha boy. When a nut swinging honda lover argues with another nut swinging honda lover. Whose Vtec is going to own these streets?


Kobi & Damien.. some tips. No need to thank me.
"Its not the size of the engine that matters... its how much shit you can bolt to it....."
Image

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by scientist »

/////////Ralliart

Post Reply