Toyota FT-86 Concept

Non Technical Talk in here
User avatar
damien
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by damien »

kobi wrote:Say all wat u haters want....boxer engines are good engines else allu "Toyota" would not be putting one in a toyo.
And the forum was so quiet and civilized...
Image

TheGoodGuy
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:24 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by TheGoodGuy »

IF you taking something from Subaru .. at least take the all wheel drive. lol..lol with the option of rear wheel drive.. G's.. the boxer man. lol lol Its acceptable for a Subaru to be ..a Subaru.. but Not a Toyota to be a Subaru.... I would like to hear how it sounds though. Toyota heads need blows.


NB..These statements may be retracted depending on how well this car proves its self.
"Its not the size of the engine that matters... its how much shit you can bolt to it....."
Image

motion sickness
Power Junkie
Power Junkie
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:19 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by motion sickness »

Might as well have put a VTEC motor in as an option.This car sucks!!! I wouldn't think of buying it just because of the motor. Toyota should have worked with Hyundai instead. I guess Toyota can't produce good pocket rockets anymore. They should have put the BEAMS 3S from the Altezza.

I do like the looks.....looks like the "Supra" concept car.

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by skidmarx »

motion sickness wrote:Might as well have put a VTEC motor in as an option.This car sucks!!! I wouldn't think of buying it just because of the motor. Toyota should have worked with Hyundai instead. I guess Toyota can't produce good pocket rockets anymore. They should have put the BEAMS 3S from the Altezza.

I do like the looks.....looks like the "Supra" concept car.
back you 100% the beams 2000 3SGE or even a RWD mounted version of the K20. are there any recent successors to the 4AGE?

Poor engine choice though with the EJ20 there. makes the new hachi roku sound like a bike now. very much not the 86 tradition there. [thumbsup] to the frame design [ugly] to the engine choice.
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by scientist »

Beams 3S would not make the grade (Would not pass emissions or provide good enough fuel economy). the ZZ or AZ series motors could have made it in there. think of a reworked head, higher compression 2AZ-FE or call it a 2A-GE...2.4L and a decent amount of horsepower.

Hyundai and Mitsubishi sharing engines. the new 86 would definitely not stack up against the Genesis Coupe
/////////Ralliart

motion sickness
Power Junkie
Power Junkie
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:19 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by motion sickness »

I think if Toyota wanted they could have gotten the BEAMS to pass smog laws. Just add another cat....lol! Maybe even the new 2.5 with dual vvti in the 2010 camrys would be better. I drove and one to Florida back in May, they run nice. The 2.4 is a horrible performance engine. I've driven too many camrys, corollas and TCs not to know better.

Really, Toyota should have gone back to its roots and called Yamaha to develop a motor for this car. This too much of a purist car to have messed up the motor choice. Its like asking Ford to use its EcoTec motor for an all new Supra.

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by skidmarx »

scientist wrote:Hyundai and Mitsubishi sharing engines. the new 86 would definitely not stack up against the Genesis Coupe
with its current engine choice?
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by skidmarx »

motion sickness wrote:I think if Toyota wanted they could have gotten the BEAMS to pass smog laws. Just add another cat....lol! Maybe even the new 2.5 with dual vvti in the 2010 camrys would be better. I drove and one to Florida back in May, they run nice. The 2.4 is a horrible performance engine. I've driven too many camrys, corollas and TCs not to know better.

Really, Toyota should have gone back to its roots and called Yamaha to develop a motor for this car. This too much of a purist car to have messed up the motor choice. Its like asking Ford to use its EcoTec motor for an all new Supra.
lol ok sir.... i still vote for the Beams 3S, my mind didnt even cross the 2AZ though.
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by scientist »

skidmarx wrote:
scientist wrote:Hyundai and Mitsubishi sharing engines. the new 86 would definitely not stack up against the Genesis Coupe
with its current engine choice?
The 3S, SR20, 4G63, RB25/26, 1/2JZ etc are all old engine designs. the amount of modifications + the amount of power loss and efficiency loss would not make none of those engines a worthwhile venture for the manufacturers. That's why they have all been replaced.
/////////Ralliart

User avatar
Preppy
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:21 pm

Re: Toyota FT-86 Concept

Post by Preppy »

TheGoodGuy wrote:IF you taking something from Subaru .. at least take the all wheel drive. lol..lol with the option of rear wheel drive.. G's.. the boxer man. lol lol Its acceptable for a Subaru to be ..a Subaru.. but Not a Toyota to be a Subaru.... I would like to hear how it sounds though. Toyota heads need blows.


NB..These statements may be retracted depending on how well this car proves its self.

its rumored there may be an awd Toyota with Subaru AWD and turbo boxer goodness.
Image


Image Image

Post Reply