RB26 350Z

Non Technical Talk in here
User avatar
djphattraxx
Power Junkie
Power Junkie
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:51 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by djphattraxx »

KA-T70 wrote: The rb is not as forgiving as the JZ motor is especially the 2jzgte. 800hp is considered average for a 2JZ and most of them are stock bottom end. Toyota is king case close!


i agree with U 100% my boy!! all i was saying is if they had put the RB26 engine in the 350 Z instead of what is in the Z now and tried to pass it off as the new skyline, that i or we would be all happier than the one they going to put out in 08/09

User avatar
SF5
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1309
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:15 pm

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by SF5 »

oh Ok, well it is a V6 and V8 revolution them season. Pressure from the west has caused jdm to put stupid stinking v6 and v8 shit in all the good shit.

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by skidmarx »

Scientist wrote: Whats wrong with the engine the car coming with?
Things comes and go...the RB engine as well as the JZ engines lived past their life cycle

now hold up a minute! what do you mean life cycle?
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by skidmarx »

KA-T70 wrote: oh Ok, well it is a V6 and V8 revolution them season. Pressure from the west has caused jdm to put stupid stinking v6 and v8 shit in all the good shit.

yeah well i agree with em. make it the way the customer like. i guess its because of production costs they dont make their version and the western demand version differ as far as engines are concerned. because i would imagine that they would make theirs to their liking with their beloved inline engines and then make the V for their clients. anyway whatever works.
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by scientist »

skidmarx wrote:
Scientist wrote: Whats wrong with the engine the car coming with?
Things comes and go...the RB engine as well as the JZ engines lived past their life cycle

now hold up a minute! what do you mean life cycle?

As in it has reached the end of its development cycle where it is no longer cost effective no efficient to continue with that platform...lets compare

Nissan
CA axed in favour of SR
SR axed in favour of QR
RB axed in favour of VQ
etc


Honda
B axed for K

Toyota
well too many to list

Mitsubish
4G replaced by 4B


Remember most of the engines you guys inlove with have been around since the 80s......they have been in production for almost 20 years in some cases.
skidmarx wrote:
KA-T70 wrote: oh Ok, well it is a V6 and V8 revolution them season. Pressure from the west has caused jdm to put stupid stinking v6 and v8 shit in all the good shit.

yeah well i agree with em. make it the way the customer like. i guess its because of production costs they dont make their version and the western demand version differ as far as engines are concerned. because i would imagine that they would make theirs to their liking with their beloved inline engines and then make the V for their clients. anyway whatever works.

That is what the customers want, Fuel efficient, easy to drive, good sounding engines. Engineers prefer V engines to inLine engines.
/////////Ralliart

User avatar
damien
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by damien »

Trust me all that is true. Imagine the latest on the new NSX is that it's gonna have a 4.0 V10!! who'd have thunk it!?!
Image

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by skidmarx »

damien wrote: Trust me all that is true. Imagine the latest on the new NSX is that it's gonna have a 4.0 V10!! who'd have thunk it!?!

hmmm sounds italian-ish to me.
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
skidmarx
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1009
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:18 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by skidmarx »

yeah its true because before they were developed, there was a previous engine and then they took over, moved up 1 or 2 generations then got axed for never developed engines, but i still aint know why engineers prefer V to IL engines. i could think up something like center of mass and shaft length issues. [donno]
Image
Word of advice - "Dont let them see you coming"
whispering now.... [sneaky]
"True car enthusiasts are open-minded to everyone's creation"

User avatar
scientist
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4599
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:31 am

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by scientist »

Inline Aluminum Vs seem to be more cost effective and lighter to manufacture.
/////////Ralliart

User avatar
Preppy
You can't stop posting can you
You can't stop posting can you
Posts: 1101
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:21 pm

Re: RB26 350Z

Post by Preppy »

dont BMW still make inline engines?
Image


Image Image

Post Reply