Page 3 of 3
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:54 pm
by djphattraxx
KA-T70 wrote:
nope! To me this supra isn't special, the only partially unique feature on this car is the twin turbo setup... not as common as the big singles running around.the all too familiar TRD wide body kit and trd wing. Its a beautiful car don't get me wrong, clean and exceptional. But there are like dozens of supras looking exactly like that... its all been done. There isn't anything spectacular you can do with these cars anymore.
you forget WE not living in a country that has "dozens of Supra's lookin any thing like that" so i dont think seeing a picture is good enuff for me
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:40 pm
by SF5
Read what you just type, you're contradicting yourself. Its a nice supra but to be honest, a supra looks good enough in its own skin and a set of wheels.
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:20 pm
by djphattraxx
how did i contradict my self ?? all i said was (seeing a car in a picture is not as good as seeing it in person !) you said you see them every day and it aint nothing special !
AND i dont think the yellow wide kit supra would look good in its own skin and rims in yellow! i dont know of ANY affordable tuner car that looks good bone stock! if you do show me one!
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:36 am
by scientist
Alot of the Newer cars look good bone stock
The evo 9 looks good, the 8 MR looks good
the Type Rs always looked good bone stock jus to name a few.
but thats besides the topic. I understood wat you were sayin Phat-t
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:20 am
by djphattraxx
LOL Sci i did say "affordable" LOL
but you made your point! they do look good! B/S but even then, if you have the bubs you would still go and add or change something on it LOL ;o)
Re: Nick Hogan's Serious Accident
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:35 pm
by damien